Graffiti in the 1970s wasn’t just vandalism; it was the voice of the voiceless, a bold declaration of existence from urban youth. As I delve into the colorful tags and murals that lined the subways and buildings, I’m struck by the raw energy that fueled a cultural revolution.
This era’s graffiti artists were pioneers, laying down the groundwork for what would become a global art movement. They turned the streets into galleries, challenging the very notion of what art could be. Join me as I explore the origins and impact of 1970s graffiti, a time when spray cans and markers spoke louder than words.
Origins of 1970s graffiti
Graffiti’s roots are intricately woven into the fabric of urban culture. When I delve into the 1970s, a pivotal decade for graffiti, I can’t help but notice its stark contrast against the clean-cut aesthetics of Main Street artistry. It emerged from the depths of New York City’s burrows, where the youth, feeling marginalized and overlooked, sought a means to claim visibility. They took to the streets—literally painting their stories, frustrations, and identities onto the canvases of public transit and derelict buildings.
This period saw the evolution of graffiti from mere scratching on surfaces to establishing a unique style characterized by bold lettering and vibrant color schemes. Cornbread, a Philadelphia native, is often credited with being one of the first modern graffiti artists, tagging his name across the city to garner attention from a girl he admired. His actions, although personal, sparked a wave of inspiration. Soon, New York would see its transit system become a mobile gallery, with artists such as TAKI 183 and Stay High 149 gaining notoriety. Their pseudonyms became symbols of resistance and creative expression.
By the mid-70s, this burgeoning art form was propelled even further by the media. A New York Times article on TAKI 183 served as a catalyst, birthing an underground community flush with artists determined to make their mark. The subway system, buses, and street corners became arenas for these artists to flex their skills and occasionally, to spar through their art.
The language of graffiti was a coded vernacular—tags, throw-ups, and eventually, elaborate pieces told a narrative of a youth culture that refused to be silenced. Its proliferation was undeniable and unstoppable. Every etching and stroke underlined the social and political undercurrents of the times, echoing the voices that society tried to mute.
Development of this art form did not happen in isolation. Cultural movements throughout history have always been interlinked, and in the 70s, graffiti intertwined with the rise of hip-hop culture. Breaking, DJing, and MCing found their visual counterpart in the explosive and expressive nature of graffiti art. The synergy between these elements fostered a new subculture that was rebellious, poignant, and deeply impactful.
The rise of graffiti artists
During the explosive era of the 1970s, walls became canvases for artists of the streets. They were no ordinary artists; their art was born from the alleys and subways of the city jungle. I’ve researched and found that this was the time when graffiti artists began to gain fame, sometimes notoriety, for their bold, audacious pieces. They weren’t just leaving their mark; they were shouting their existence to a world they felt was all too ready to ignore them.
It’s often forgotten how competitive the graffiti scene was. These artists were constantly striving to innovate, to outdo each other, and ultimately to elevate their crafts. This lead to the development of distinct styles, such as Wildstyle, a fluid and complex type of graffiti which required serious skill. These styles became signatures, and just like any celebrated artist in history, recognition followed. Names like Lady Pink and Futura 2000 became legends, and their work is now synonymous with the art of that era.
The escalation of graffiti’s complexity is also notable. What began as tags, or basic signatures, evolved into elaborate pieces that involved layering, shadowing, and incorporating 3D effects. Snooping through old records and watching documentaries, I’ve seen how murals spread from the sides of trains to the walls of buildings, captivating wider audiences.
Interestingly, this also sparked the beginning of commercial interest in graffiti. Galleries began to see the value of street art and started showcasing work from graffiti artists. The elusive Jean-Michel Basquiat, who began with SAMO tags, transitioned into a star of the 1980s art scene, demonstrating that graffiti was more than just writing on a wall – it was a potent form of contemporary art.
While the debate carries on about whether graffiti is art or vandalism, the mark that these artists left on the fabric of urban culture remains indelible. Their work didn’t just redefine the notion of public art; it interrogated societal norms and gave a voice to those who were struggling to be heard above the din of the concrete metropolis.
Exploring the subways and buildings
In the heart of New York City, the subway system became the canvas of choice for many graffiti artists. This underground network offered a vast, mobile gallery for their work. The stainless steel sides of trains presented a gleaming surface for tags, which would then travel through the city, showcasing the artists’ skills to a wider audience.
My journey through these subterranean corridors revealed an array of styles that defined the era. Graffiti artists often worked under the cover of darkness, risking arrest for the thrill of seeing their pseudonyms emblazoned across train cars. The competition was fierce; every piece sought to outdo the last in complexity and brightness. Operating in this clandestine manner gave the graffiti movement a thrilling edge — it was art flouting the very laws of the land.
Emerging from the subways, the city’s buildings provided another prominent stage for graffiti. Artists took advantage of derelict structures and high-traffic areas to maximize exposure. I observed how building murals, unlike the moving canvases of the subways, stood as anchors in the neighborhoods. They often became landmarks, reflective of the community’s character and struggles.
The significance of style
- Tags: The simplest form, including the artist’s unique signature.
- Throw-ups: Larger than tags, with two colors, offering greater visibility.
- Pieces: Short for masterpieces, these intricate works can occupy large wall spaces and may involve multiple colors.
The transition from tagging to creating elaborate pieces demonstrated the evolution of the artists’ skill sets. Developing a signature style wasn’t simply about personal expression; it established one’s reputation on the streets. Wildstyle, with its interlocked letters and symbols, became synonymous with the scene — a visual language unto itself.
If you are ready to delve into the graffiti world yourself, check out our guide on how to master graffiti for beginners!
Interaction with public perception
Public reaction to the spread of graffiti was polarized. For some, the colorful displays were a welcome disruption of the gray concrete jungle, injecting life and culture into the cityscape. Others viewed the proliferation as a sign of urban decay, advocating for swift removal. My exploration of this dichotomy revealed a nuanced conversation around urban art versus vandalism. Despite differing opinions, it’s clear that these works ignited a potent dialogue about space, ownership, and aesthetics.
The forgotten voice of the youth
In the 1970s, graffiti wasn’t just about the visual impact; for many young people, it was their megaphone to the world. I quickly learned that these spray-painted messages went beyond the mere desire to be seen; they were a form of expression for the voiceless youth. In neighborhoods where opportunities were scarce and voices muted by the bustling city life, graffiti became a way for the young artists to shout their experiences from the rooftops—quite literally.
The subway as a moving storybook
The subway cars of New York City turned into a moving patchwork of stories. Each colorful tag was a signature, each mural a chapter of someone’s life. The artists behind these works were as diverse as the city itself, coming from various backgrounds but united by a common thread: the need to be heard. They chose subway cars because they traveled throughout the city, ferrying their personal expressions, joys, struggles, and social commentary across boroughs, penetrating neighborhoods that often turned a blind eye to them.
Graffiti’s role in the cultural dialogue
It’s important to point out the cultural dialogue these images sparked. While some dismissed the graffiti as mere defacement, for others, it represented a raw and uncensored reflection of the city’s youth. It was a visual diary, an archive of an era’s emotional landscape, capturing everything from political outrage to declarations of love. This wasn’t just about making a mark; it was about making a statement. As the years progressed, so did the complexity and thematic nature of their work.
One must remember that during this time, traditional platforms for young people to express themselves were either non-existent or challenging to access. Graffiti was democratic in the sense that all you needed was a can of spray paint and an idea. It required neither formal training nor approval from the establishment. This liberated form of creativity gave birth to a uniquely free and independent youth culture that otherwise would have remained muted in a society that often overlooked the underprivileged and the young.
The cultural revolution
In the heart of the 1970s, graffiti wasn’t just art; it was a cultural revolution. Bold tags and sprawling murals weren’t mere acts of rebellion—they were declarations of existence from communities that felt invisible. Graffiti artists, many of them youths marginalized by society, harnessed the visceral power of color and form to project their identities across the city’s canvas.
As the decade progressed, graffiti’s influence permeated various aspects of culture. Initially viewed as the handiwork of delinquents, it increasingly garnered attention from the art world. Rivalries formed not only within the nebulous community of graffiti artists but also in the societal debate over the movement’s validity. Trailblazers in graffiti culture began to see their works discussed in the same spaces as traditional fine art.
The explosion of graffiti on the subways and streets of New York City turned neighborhoods into galleries of the people. It was here that I saw the narrative of a city being rewritten, a narrative punctuated by the signature styles and symbols unique to each artist. The train cars became scrolls of modern hieroglyphs, each stop a chapter in the city’s unfolding story.
While some denounced the spread of graffiti as a blight, forward-thinkers understood it as an avant-garde force, pushing the boundaries of what was deemed acceptable. Its impact led to the germination of street art as a recognized genre. Brands and musicians alike soon picked up on the raw aesthetic of graffiti, folding it into their visuals, and cementing its role in shaping pop culture. Today, you can utilize this fiery design philosophy in the form of graffiti car wraps..
Youth found not just a voice but a megaphone in the sprawling tangle of spray-painted letters. I could see how entire communities were reflected on the sides of buildings, declaring their struggles, joys, and existence to a world that often turned a blind eye. Graffiti became a visual language with the power to communicate beyond the limits of social barriers, an artistic dialect that resonated with many who had no other outlet for expression.
The enduring legacy of 1970s graffiti on contemporary art
Reflecting on the vibrant history of 1970s graffiti, it’s clear that this was more than just art; it was a movement. The colorful tags and intricate pieces that adorned New York’s subway cars and buildings were not merely acts of rebellion—they were the voices of a generation clamoring to be heard. As I’ve delved into the impact of graffiti, I’ve come to appreciate its role in challenging the status quo and shaping the cultural landscape.
It’s fascinating how these visual expressions carved out a new space for dialogue, transforming the urban environment into a canvas for social commentary. Graffiti’s legacy continues to influence art and culture today, proving that what started on the streets can indeed rise to the echelons of global recognition.
Check out our shop for graffiti-themed apparel, from sweatshirts and hoodies to posters and canvases.
Frequently asked questions
What is the historical significance of graffiti in the 1970s?
Graffiti in the 1970s played a critical role as a form of expression for marginalized youth. It transformed New York City subways into dynamic galleries and served as a voice for those often unheard in society.
How did graffiti artists in New York City use the subway system?
Graffiti artists used the subway system as a mobile canvas to showcase their work, ensuring widespread visibility as trains traveled throughout the city, thereby creating a highly competitive and vibrant artistic community.
What are the different styles of graffiti mentioned in the article?
The article discusses various graffiti styles such as tags (simple signatures), throw-ups (larger and more complex than tags), and pieces (elaborate and intricate works), indicating an evolution in artists’ skill and creativity.
How did the public perceive graffiti during this era?
Public perception of graffiti in the 1970s was polarized. Some appreciated it as a refreshing disruption of the urban landscape, while others condemned it as a sign of decay and lawlessness.
Did graffiti have an impact on pop culture and society?
Yes, graffiti significantly influenced pop culture and society by transforming public spaces into platforms for self-expression and dialogue. It shaped cultural trends and gave a voice to the socially marginalized.
What transition in graffiti is highlighted by the move from tagging to pieces?
The transition from tagging to creating complex pieces showcases the growth of graffiti artists’ skill sets, as well as their desire to gain recognition and establish reputations within the street art scene.
How did graffiti serve as a platform for the youth in the 1970s?
Graffiti provided a vital outlet for young people to convey their stories and perspectives, especially for those who felt overlooked by mainstream society, thus turning subway cars and urban landscapes into narratives of the voiceless.
Has graffiti been recognized in the art world?
Yes, over time, graffiti has gained recognition as a legitimate art form within the art world, influencing various aspects of culture and being celebrated for its vibrant and rebellious nature.